Journal of Discourse Review

Author guidelines

We publish original, peer-reviewed research that examines the complex relationships between language, culture, society, and identity, with an emphasis on contemporary global challenges. 

Themes for Contribution

We welcome contributions addressing—but not limited to—the following areas:

  • Language and Power: Discourses of Inclusion and Exclusion
  • Globalisation and Local Narratives
  • Technology, Communication, and Society
  • Cultural Practices and Identity through Language
  • Climate Discourse and Social Responsibility
  • Health, Discourse, and Society
  • Political Rhetoric and Public Opinion
  • Education and Critical Discourse
  • Gender, Discourse, and Social Change
  • Migration, Mobility, and Multilingual Discourses

Submissions from interdisciplinary perspectives are strongly encouraged.

Submission Guidelines

General Requirements

  • Manuscript Length: 6,000 to 8,000 words (including references)
  • File Format: Microsoft Word (.docx)
  • Referencing Style: APA 7th Edition
  • Language: English. Authors may also include an abstract in their mother tongue to promote a multilingual ethos.

Structure of the Manuscript

  • Title Page
    • Title (concise and informative)
    • Full name(s) of author(s)
    • Affiliation(s)
    • Email(s)
    • ORCID iD (if available)
  • Abstract
    • 200–250 words
    • Keywords (5–6)
  • Main Body

The Journal of Discourse Review prioritises analytical depth, original contributions, and thematic relevance in discourse-related research. The following guidelines provide a detailed outline of each section of the manuscript’s main body. Authors are expected to structure their work accordingly. Manuscripts may be empirical (case study-based) or theoretical but must provide new insights into discourse analysis or discourse-oriented inquiry.

1. Introduction

This section should briefly introduce the topic, outline the purpose of the paper, and highlight its relevance. Authors may choose to situate their work within broader academic or societal conversations, state their research questions (if applicable), and indicate what the reader can expect in the paper.

Note: The introduction need not be lengthy, but it should provide enough context to understand the motivation behind the work.

2. Theoretical Framework / Literature Review

Authors may include a discussion of related research, concepts, or theoretical perspectives that inform their work. This section can:

  • Provide an overview of existing studies or ideas related to the topic
  • Identify areas of agreement or debate
  • Clarify how the current paper relates to or builds upon previous work

Tip: Instead of listing studies, synthesise them around key debates or issues.

3. Methodology (for empirical studies only)

For papers that involve empirical research or data collection, this section can describe:

  • The approach taken (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, etc.)
  • The setting, materials, or participants involved
  • How data were gathered and analysed
  • Any relevant ethical considerations

Authors may also include reflections on challenges or decisions made during the research process. This section can be adapted based on the nature of the work—for example, conceptual or theoretical papers may not require a methodology section.

Tip: Use subheadings to enhance readability, especially in longer methodology sections.

4. Analysis and Discussion

This is typically the most substantial part of the manuscript and should offer a thoughtful and well-developed examination of the topic. Whether based on data, theory, or reflection, this section should aim to:

  • Present observations, interpretations, or arguments clearly
  • Support key points with examples, citations, or evidence
  • Connect ideas across different parts of the paper
  • Highlight new perspectives or insights

We recommend that this section make up at least 55–60% of the total manuscript, as it forms the heart of the contribution.

Tip: Balance evidence with interpretation. Integrate literature where needed to support or contrast findings.

5. Conclusion

The conclusion can summarise the key ideas discussed in the paper, reflect on their significance, and suggest possible directions for future work. It may also address the broader implications of the study or the questions it raises.

Authors are welcome to be concise or reflective, depending on the tone and focus of their work.

Tip: Emphasise the contribution your study makes to discourse studies, especially in the South Asian or Global South context if applicable.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors are requested to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could be perceived to influence the objectivity, integrity, or outcomes of their research. A conflict of interest does not necessarily prevent publication, but transparency is essential to maintain ethical standards and trust in scholarly publishing.

What Authors Should Do

At the time of submission, authors must:

  • Declare any actual or potential conflicts of interest under a separate heading titled “Conflict of Interest” just before the References section.
  • If there are no conflicts to declare, include the statement:
    “The author(s) declare/s that there are no conflicts of interest related to this research.”

 

Referencing Guidelines (APA 7th Edition)

The Journal of Discourse Review follows the APA (American Psychological Association) 7th Edition referencing style. All manuscripts submitted to the journal must adhere to these guidelines for in-text citations, reference lists, tables, and figures.

Below is a detailed outline to help authors format their references correctly.

1. In-Text Citations

In-text citations briefly identify the source of information within the body of the manuscript. APA uses the author–date system.

A. Paraphrasing or Summarising

  • Include the author’s surname and the year of publication.
  • Page numbers are optional but encouraged when referring to specific ideas.

Example:
(Sen, 2010)
or
Sen (2010) argues that...

B. Direct Quotations

  • Use quotation marks for quotes under 40 words.
  • Include author, year, and page number.

Example:
"Language is not neutral" (Fairclough, 1992, p. 57).

For quotes over 40 words, use a block quote format (indented, no quotation marks), with the citation placed after the final punctuation.

C. Multiple Authors

  • Two authors: List both names (Smith & Kumar, 2021).
  • Three or more authors: Use the first author’s surname followed by et al. (Ali et al., 2019).

D. Multiple Works

  • For citations with more than one source, arrange them alphabetically and separate with semicolons:
    (Chomsky, 1965; Halliday, 1978; Wodak, 2011)

2. Reference List

All sources cited in the text must appear in the reference list, and vice versa. The list should appear at the end of the manuscript under the heading References, in alphabetical order by the first author’s surname.

A. Books

Format:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of book: Subtitle in italics. Publisher.

Example:
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

B. Journal Articles

Format:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx

Example:
Blommaert, J. (2005). Bourdieu the ethnographer: The ethnographic grounding of habitus and voice. The Translator, 11(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195

C. Book Chapters

Format:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of chapter. In E. E. Editor (Ed.), Title of book (pp. xx–xx). Publisher.

Example:
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Back to the future. In J. S. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 367–376). Routledge.

D. Webpages

Format:
Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of webpage. Website Name. URL

Example:
United Nations. (2023, June 5). World environment day. UN News. https://www.un.org/en/world-environment-day

E. Newspaper Articles

Format:
Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of article. Newspaper Name, page number (if available).

Example:
Chopra, R. (2022, December 19). Language politics in Indian schools. The Hindu, p. 8.

3. Tables

Tables should be used to present concise, non-redundant data. Each table must:

  • Be numbered (e.g., Table 1, Table 2, etc.)
  • Include a title in italics above the table
  • Have clear column/row headings
  • Include notes below the table if needed (e.g., source, explanation)

Example:

Table 1
Distribution of Language Use Across Domains

Domain English (%) Hindi (%)
Home 30 70
Workplace 60 40

Note: Percentages represent averages across 50 participants.

4. Figures

Figures may include images, charts, graphs, or illustrations. Each figure should:

  • Be numbered (e.g., Figure 1, Figure 2)
  • Have a descriptive caption below the figure
  • Be referred to in the text (e.g., “As shown in Figure 1...”)
  • Be of high resolution (min. 300 dpi)

Example:

Figure 1
Conceptual Framework for Language Identity Construction

(Insert image here)

Illustrations (Figures, Charts, and Diagrams)

If your article includes essential illustrations—such as diagrams, charts, graphs, or other visual materials—please provide them as separate high-resolution files, clearly labeled as Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and so on. These files should not be embedded within the main manuscript document.

In the body of your manuscript, indicate the intended placement of each illustration using the following format:

(Insert Figure 1 here)
(Insert Figure 2 here)

This helps the editorial team and typesetters understand the correct positioning of the visuals during the layout process.

Formatting Guidelines for Figures

  • Acceptable formats: JPEG, PNG, TIFF, or high-quality PDF
  • Minimum resolution: 300 dpi
  • Figures should be numbered consecutively based on their order of appearance in the manuscript
  • Each figure must have a caption that briefly describes its content (placed below the figure)
  • If adapted from another source, please provide proper citation and permissions as needed

Terms of Acceptance

Authors submitting their work to the Journal of Discourse Review are kindly requested to review the following terms, which outline the editorial process and publication expectations.

1. Submission Copies

Please retain a copy of your manuscript for your records. Submissions will not be returned, regardless of the outcome.

2. Peer Review and Decision Timeline

All submissions will undergo a peer review process, typically reviewed by members of the Editorial Board or external experts. Decisions on acceptance, revision, or rejection will generally be communicated within approximately three months of receipt. We aim to provide timely and constructive feedback to support authors throughout the process.

3. Formatting and Editorial Changes

Manuscripts should be prepared in accordance with the guidelines outlined in this document. The Editor may request reformatting of articles that do not follow the submission specifications.

The editorial team also reserves the right to make minor changes to accepted manuscripts to improve clarity, consistency, or style. Authors will receive a copy-edited version for approval and will be asked to return any corrections or comments by the deadline provided.

To facilitate communication, authors should provide their full postal address, email address, and contact number at the time of submission.

4. Copyright and Permissions

Authors are responsible for securing permission to use any third-party materials (e.g., copyrighted text, figures, or illustrations). Any associated fees must be borne by the author unless otherwise agreed in writing.

The Journal of Discourse Review assumes that submitted work:

  • Has not been published elsewhere in the same or similar form
  • Is not currently under consideration for publication in another journal
  • Will not be submitted elsewhere until a final decision is communicated

5. Copyright and Author Rights

Upon acceptance, authors will be invited to complete a copyright licence form, granting Journal of Discourse Review the right to publish the work.

Authors retain the right to:

  • Reuse their article in their own future work (e.g., books, collections), with proper citation to the Journal of Discourse Review as the original place of publication
  • Grant permission to others to reproduce the article, provided proper attribution is given and permission is obtained from both the journal and the author

All requests for third-party reproduction should be directed to the journal’s editorial team, and we will consult the author before granting any such requests.

6. Communication and Author Information

By submitting a manuscript, authors acknowledge that the Journal of Discourse Review may use the email address provided to correspond regarding the status of the submission. If your contact details change during the review or production process, please notify the editorial team promptly.

Please note that we do not retain rejected manuscripts or associated files after the decision process is completed.