CONTENTS
Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) has adopted the following journal policies:
JDR adheres to an Open Access publishing model committed to facilitating broad dissemination, academic visibility, and unrestricted global access to scholarly research. All articles published by JDR are immediately available online upon publication, providing readers, researchers, educators, policymakers, and the general public with barrier-free access to content of the highest scholarly standards.
Under our Open Access policy, users can freely read, download, search, link to the full texts, or utilize the articles for any other lawful academic and non-commercial purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers. This approach ensures the broadest possible engagement with the content, promoting collaboration, citation, and academic discourse globally.
By adopting this policy, JDR supports and promotes transparency, knowledge sharing, and equitable access, aligning with principles advocated by major international research funding bodies and institutions. Our commitment to Open Access endorses our dedication to advancing discourse studies, contributing to the growth of knowledge across academic disciplines, and enhancing the societal impact of research outputs.
JDR invites submissions of original research articles that contribute significantly to discourse studies and related interdisciplinary fields. Submission of a manuscript to JDR implies that the manuscript has not been previously published, nor is it under review or consideration by any other journal or publication. Authors must refrain from submitting their manuscript to other publications while it is under consideration by JDR.
JDR maintains the exclusive right to accept or reject submitted manuscripts based on their scholarly merit, originality, methodological rigor, and adherence to the journal’s scope and guidelines. Acceptance decisions remain conditional, and the journal reserves the right to retract acceptance if significant concerns regarding scientific accuracy, ethical considerations, or violations of publication standards and policies arise during the editorial or production process.
Authors submitting original research involving human subjects must provide documented approval from their respective Human Ethics Review Board or equivalent ethical oversight committee. This ethical compliance is a prerequisite for publication consideration to maintain rigorous standards of research integrity and ethical responsibility.
JDR employs a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure scholarly quality, objectivity, and integrity in all published research. Each submitted manuscript undergoes initial editorial assessment followed by peer review.
Upon submission, manuscripts are assigned to an Editorial Board member who assesses the manuscript's relevance, originality, methodological rigor, and overall suitability for the journal. Manuscripts meeting the journal’s criteria are then advanced to the peer-review stage. Authors must disclose any related work under consideration or previously published elsewhere by providing copies at submission.
Manuscripts deemed suitable undergo evaluation by at least two independent subject matter experts selected by the Editorial Board. The reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific rigor, clarity, originality, and contribution to the discipline. Authors may suggest potential reviewers or exclude certain individuals from reviewing their manuscript; however, the final selection of reviewers is at the Editorial Board's discretion. Reviewer identities remain confidential unless explicitly disclosed by the reviewer.
Based on reviewers' comments and recommendations, the Editorial Board member makes one of the following decisions:
Accept the manuscript outright
Minor revision: authors are asked to make limited changes addressing specific issues
Major revision: authors must address significant concerns, potentially involving additional data collection or analysis
Reject the manuscript outright
The Editor-in-Chief retains ultimate responsibility for publication decisions and may consult Advisory Board members when necessary.
If revisions are requested, authors must submit a revised manuscript within a stipulated time frame along with a detailed point-by-point response addressing all reviewers’ comments. Revised manuscripts may be sent back to original reviewers or to new reviewers at the discretion of the Editorial Board.
Authors may appeal a rejection decision by submitting a detailed justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Upon review of the appeal, the Editor-in-Chief may seek an additional reviewer’s opinion before reaching a final decision. Correspondence regarding manuscript decisions should strictly involve only the Editor-in-Chief or designated editors. Direct communication with reviewers or other editorial board members concerning manuscript decisions is prohibited and may result in manuscript rejection.
Once all editorial concerns have been satisfactorily addressed, manuscripts are formally accepted for publication. After acceptance, authors receive proofs for correction of typographical or factual errors only; substantial changes to the manuscript content or structure are generally not permitted at this stage. Authors are required to ensure manuscripts comply fully with the formatting guidelines detailed in the JDR Author Guidelines before final publication.
JDR recognizes that maximizing the potential of open access involves removing barriers that restrict the reuse and dissemination of scholarly work. To facilitate this openness and ensure broad and unhindered academic engagement, JDR employs Creative Commons (CC) licenses, which serve as standardized legal tools promoting the open sharing of knowledge.
Under traditional publishing models, authors typically transfer exclusive rights to publishers, which can limit reuse and access. In contrast, JDR adopts a progressive approach, wherein authors retain copyright and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to publish and distribute their work. This policy empowers authors by allowing them to maintain ownership of their intellectual output while enabling widespread distribution and utilization.
Specifically, JDR applies the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). This license permits unrestricted sharing, copying, distribution, and adaptation of the published content, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and source. Users of JDR content must clearly attribute the original authors and acknowledge the journal as the initial publisher.
The CC-BY license ensures the maximum possible dissemination and reuse of research outputs, promoting greater academic impact, facilitating collaboration, and supporting innovative uses of research findings. By implementing the CC-BY license, JDR aligns with international open access standards, promoting transparency, academic freedom, and the advancement of knowledge on a global scale.
For additional information about the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), authors and readers may refer to the official Creative Commons website: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
JDR is committed to ensuring the long-term availability and preservation of its scholarly content. To achieve this goal, JDR utilizes the Amazon Web Services (AWS) archival system. This robust and reliable system provides permanent digital archives designed specifically for comprehensive preservation, secure storage, and reliable restoration of published content.
Through AWS, JDR ensures continuous accessibility, protection against data loss, and disaster recovery capabilities. This archiving policy safeguards the integrity and longevity of scholarly records, ensuring they remain accessible to researchers, institutions, and the broader academic community now and in the future.
By implementing this archival strategy, JDR demonstrates its commitment to responsible scholarly publishing, transparency, and sustainable preservation practices, providing authors and readers confidence that their contributions will remain permanently and securely accessible.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) maintains strict standards of publication ethics to maintain the integrity, credibility, and trustworthiness of academic research. As a double-blind peer-reviewed journal, JDR strictly adheres to ethical guidelines and expects all authors, reviewers, and editorial members to comply with best practices in scholarly publishing.
a. Ethical Standards and Academic Integrity
JDR does not tolerate any form of unethical research or publication practices. Any manuscript found in violation of ethical standards will be subject to immediate action, which may include rejection, retraction, or banning of the author(s) from future submissions. The journal adheres to the following key ethical principles:
● Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is original and properly cited. Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism and improper paraphrasing, is strictly prohibited. JDR employs plagiarism detection software to screen submissions at any stage of the review and publication process.
● Data Integrity and Research Fabrication: Authors must provide accurate and authentic research findings. Fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data, tables, images, or results is a serious violation of ethical standards and will lead to rejection or retraction.
● Authorship and Acknowledgment: Authorship should be limited to individuals who have significantly contributed to the research. Ghost authorship, honorary authorship, and undisclosed co-authorships are not permitted. Proper acknowledgment must be given to all contributors and funding sources.
● Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Submissions: Manuscripts submitted to JDR must not be under consideration by another journal, nor should they have been previously published. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals is unethical and will result in immediate rejection.
● Ethical Clearance for Human and Animal Research: Any study involving human participants or animals must have obtained prior ethical approval from a recognized ethics review board. Authors are required to submit documented ethical clearance along with their manuscript.
● Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Authors, reviewers, and editorial board members must disclose any conflicts of interest that may influence their research, review, or editorial decisions.
b. Use of Language Models and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Academic Writing
With the increasing role of AI and language models in academic research and writing, JDR acknowledges the potential benefits and ethical concerns associated with their use. To maintain research integrity, the following guidelines apply:
● Transparency in AI-Assisted Writing: Authors must disclose any use of AI-based tools, including language models such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or similar AI-assisted platforms, in the preparation of their manuscripts. This disclosure should be clearly stated in the methodology or acknowledgment section of the paper.
● Human Oversight and Critical Evaluation: AI-generated content should not replace human authorship. Authors must ensure that all AI-assisted writing is critically reviewed, revised, and validated for accuracy and scholarly contribution. Sole reliance on AI for content generation without meaningful human input is unacceptable.
● Plagiarism and AI-Generated Content: Authors must ensure that AI-generated text does not infringe on intellectual property rights or contribute to unintentional plagiarism. AI-generated content should not be used to fabricate references or falsify citations.
● Ethical Use of AI in Research Analysis: When AI or machine learning tools are used for data analysis, natural language processing, or any computational research method, authors must provide a clear explanation of how these tools were applied and the extent of their influence on the study's findings.
● Reviewer and Editorial AI Use: JDR does not allow AI tools to independently conduct peer reviews. Reviewers and editors may use AI to assist with grammar checks or summarization but must exercise independent academic judgment in assessing the quality and originality of submissions.
JDR aligns its AI-related publication ethics with international best practices, including those recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and major academic publishers. Violations of these ethical standards, including undisclosed AI use or AI-generated content misrepresentation, may result in manuscript rejection or retraction.
By maintaining these ethical principles, JDR ensures the credibility of published research, promoting a scholarly environment that values originality, transparency, and responsible AI integration in academic publishing.
JDR supports the highest standards of academic publishing and expects all authors to adhere to ethical and professional responsibilities when submitting their work. Authors are accountable for ensuring the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their research and must comply with all journal policies, ethical guidelines, and international best practices.
Authors must provide their primary institutional affiliation, which should reflect where the majority of the research was conducted. If an author has since moved to a different institution, the current affiliation may also be stated. JDR does not assume responsibility for jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations.
Authorship carries recognition for significant intellectual contributions and entails responsibility for the research findings. To qualify as an author, individuals must have made substantial contributions to:
● The conception or design of the study
● Data collection, analysis, or interpretation
● Drafting or critically revising the manuscript for intellectual content
All authors must take responsibility for their own contributions and collectively ensure the integrity and accuracy of the entire work. If concerns arise regarding data accuracy, methodology, or findings, all authors must engage in appropriate investigation and correction efforts, with documentation of the resolution included in the scholarly record.
Role of the Corresponding Author
The corresponding author serves as the primary contact between the journal and co-authors throughout the submission, review, and publication process. This individual is responsible for:
● Ensuring that all listed authors have contributed to and approved the manuscript
● Managing all communications with JDR, including responding to editorial and reviewer queries
● Receiving and approving proofs before publication
● Addressing post-publication inquiries and ensuring timely responses on behalf of all co-authors
The corresponding author does not necessarily need to be the lead or senior author but must ensure that any editorial issues, corrections, or retractions are appropriately managed and communicated.
Confidentiality and Ethical Conduct
JDR treats all submitted manuscripts and related correspondence as confidential. Authors must also maintain confidentiality regarding communication with editors, reviewers, and other journal representatives. Manuscripts under review should not be shared, posted publicly, or discussed with external parties without prior written permission from the journal.
Authors must not engage in any form of media discussion or public dissemination of their submitted work unless explicitly permitted by the Editorial Board. Unauthorized disclosure of confidential peer review reports or editorial feedback is strictly prohibited.
Academic Integrity and Ethical Compliance
Authors are expected to adhere to the standards of ethical research and reporting, ensuring that:
● Their work is original and has not been published or submitted elsewhere
● Proper credit is given to all contributors, sources, and referenced material
● Manuscripts do not contain any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism or uncredited reuse of content
● Any use of AI-generated text or language models is disclosed, with human oversight clearly demonstrated
● Financial support, funding sources, and any conflicts of interest are transparently disclosed
● Any identified errors or inaccuracies in published work are promptly reported and corrected in collaboration with the editorial team
JDR reserves the right to use plagiarism detection tools at any stage of the review and publication process. Any manuscript found to contain plagiarized or fabricated data may be rejected, retracted, or subject to further disciplinary action.
Authors conducting research involving human participants or animals must comply with international ethical guidelines and obtain necessary approvals from an accredited ethics committee or institutional review board. Documentation of ethical clearance must be submitted with the manuscript where applicable.
All research must be conducted in a responsible and transparent manner, with clear, honest, and reproducible presentation of findings. Misrepresentation of data, falsification, or manipulation of research results will be considered a severe breach of publication ethics and may result in permanent disqualification from publishing with JDR.
Peer Review and Submission Guidelines
Authors submitting work to JDR agree to:
● Undergo the double-blind peer-review process, ensuring impartial and objective evaluation
● Cooperate with editors and reviewers by addressing feedback in a timely and constructive manner
● Prevent any conflicts of interest that could compromise the objectivity of the editorial or review process
● Maintain the confidentiality of the peer-review process and not disclose any related correspondence
Authors may suggest potential reviewers; however, the final selection of referees is at the discretion of the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board's decision regarding reviewers is final and non-negotiable.
Commitment to Global Publishing Standards
JDR adheres to internationally recognized ethical publishing standards, including those established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2010). The journal follows COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for handling ethical issues and expects all authors to maintain these principles.
Key ethical obligations under COPE guidelines include:
● Conducting research responsibly, ensuring compliance with all legal and ethical regulations
● Presenting results accurately without fabrication, falsification, or misrepresentation
● Describing methods with sufficient detail to allow reproducibility
● Acknowledging all funding sources and disclosing conflicts of interest
● Taking collective responsibility for the integrity of submitted and published work
Submission and Compliance Requirements
Manuscripts must be submitted through JDR’s online submission system. Simultaneous submission to multiple journals constitutes a violation of ethical publication standards and is strictly prohibited.
Authors are required to ensure that:
● Their manuscript complies with the journal’s ethical guidelines before submission
● Any conflicts of interest are disclosed at the time of submission
● All co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript
Non-compliance with JDR’s ethical policies may result in:
● Rejection of the manuscript at any stage of the submission or review process
● Retraction of published work in cases of ethical misconduct
● Notification to the authors’ affiliated institutions regarding ethical violations
● Restriction from future submissions to JDR
By submitting a manuscript to JDR, authors affirm their commitment to these ethical responsibilities and acknowledge their obligation to maintain the integrity of scholarly publishing. The journal remains dedicated to promoting a transparent, responsible, and ethical research environment for academic discourse.
JDR relies on the expertise and integrity of its reviewers to maintain the global standards of academic publishing. Reviewers play a critical role in ensuring the quality, objectivity, and originality of submitted manuscripts. As part of the peer-review process, reviewers are expected to maintain ethical and professional responsibilities to ensure a fair and constructive evaluation of all submissions.
Duties and Ethical Standards of Reviewers
Reviewers must adhere to the following responsibilities to maintain the integrity and credibility of the peer-review process:
● Timely and Constructive Review: Reviewers should complete their assessments within the stipulated deadline and provide well-reasoned, constructive feedback aimed at improving the manuscript’s quality.
● Confidentiality: All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, discuss, or disclose any information related to the manuscript with unauthorized individuals.
● Objectivity and Fairness: Manuscript reviews should be conducted objectively, without bias or personal criticism of the authors. Reviewers should evaluate submissions based on academic merit, providing clear and substantiated recommendations.
● Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have properly cited relevant prior research. Any uncited but significant references should be brought to the editor’s attention. Reviewers should also identify instances where the manuscript significantly overlaps with previously published works.
● Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect their objectivity. If a reviewer has affiliations, collaborations, or relationships that could influence their judgment, they must notify the editorial team and recuse themselves from the review process.
Handling of Plagiarism and Ethical Violations
JDR takes academic integrity seriously. Reviewers must remain vigilant for potential ethical violations, including:
● Plagiarism: If plagiarism is detected at any stage of the review, the reviewer must report it to the editorial team immediately. Manuscripts containing plagiarism will be rejected, and further action may be taken depending on the severity of the case.
● Duplicate Publication: Reviewers should notify the editors if they identify any significant overlap between the manuscript under review and any other published or under-review work.
● Fabrication or Manipulation of Data: If a reviewer suspects data fabrication or manipulation, they should report concerns to the editors with supporting evidence.
In cases where plagiarism or other ethical violations are confirmed post-publication, the article will be retracted, removed from the journal’s website, and a formal retraction notice will be issued. JDR reserves the right to report such cases to the author’s affiliated institution, funding agencies, or the original authors of plagiarized work.
Reviewer Accountability
Reviewers are expected to maintain the ethical integrity of the journal and to contribute to the advancement of scholarly discourse. They should:
● Communicate promptly with editors regarding their ability to review a manuscript.
● Decline review requests if they feel unqualified or unable to provide an objective assessment.
● Refrain from using privileged information obtained during peer review for personal or professional gain.
● Provide recommendations that are fair, constructive, and aligned with academic best practices.
By agreeing to review for JDR, reviewers acknowledge their commitment to ethical peer-review standards and their role in maintaining the integrity of academic publishing.
JDR follows a structured editorial process to ensure accuracy, transparency, and integrity in scholarly publishing. Decisions regarding corrections and amendments are managed by the journal’s in-house editorial team, with input from referees, the Editorial Advisory Panel, or the Editorial Board when necessary. While authors may be consulted during this process, the final decision on whether a correction is warranted and how it is classified rests with the editorial team.
Authors may request corrections to their published work if errors are identified. If the correction does not significantly alter the meaning, findings, or interpretation of the work, it will be noted in a footnote to maintain transparency for readers. This ensures that the original contribution remains accessible while acknowledging minor modifications for accuracy.
JDR remains committed to maintaining high editorial standards and providing a fair and consistent process for addressing post-publication updates while preserving the integrity of published research.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) requires all submitted manuscripts to be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. Authors must ensure that their work is unique and appropriately cited when drawing upon previously published material.
Definition and Scope of Duplicate Publication
Duplicate publication occurs when an author republishes substantial portions of their own previously published work without proper citation or acknowledgment. This includes cases such as:
● Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously.
● Republishing an identical or nearly identical paper in more than one journal.
● Fragmenting research findings ("salami slicing"), where small portions of new data are added to an already published work without presenting a significantly novel contribution.
JDR strictly prohibits duplicate publication and reserves the right to reject, retract, or take corrective measures in cases where such violations are detected.
Permitted Use of Previously Published Material
JDR recognizes that some forms of prior dissemination are an accepted part of academic scholarship. The journal considers submissions under the following conditions:
● Thesis-Based Submissions: Manuscripts based on material previously included in a Ph.D. dissertation or academic thesis, provided that it has been published in accordance with institutional requirements.
● Conference Proceedings: Manuscripts derived from previously published conference proceedings may be considered if they provide a significant extension of results, analysis, conclusions, or implications beyond the original conference paper. Authors must clearly disclose the prior conference publication, include a citation, and ensure that necessary permissions for reuse have been obtained.
Use of Previously Published Figures and Data
If an author wishes to reuse figures, tables, or other content that has been published elsewhere, proper attribution must be provided. Additionally, authors must obtain written permission from the original publisher or copyright holder before submitting the manuscript to JDR. Documentation of permissions must be included with the submission.
Consequences of Duplicate Publication
JDR employs plagiarism detection software and cross-referencing tools to identify instances of duplicate publication. If such violations are detected at any stage, the journal may:
● Reject the manuscript outright.
● Retract the publication if the violation is discovered post-publication.
● Notify the author’s affiliated institution or funding agencies about ethical misconduct.
● Restrict future submissions from authors found to have engaged in duplicate publication.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) follows a structured and ethical approach to manuscript withdrawals to ensure transparency and accountability in scholarly publishing. Authors submitting manuscripts to JDR must adhere to the following guidelines:
● Consent for Publication: Upon submission, authors must provide their explicit consent for the manuscript to undergo the peer-review process and potential publication. Once submitted, manuscripts are considered under active review and should not be withdrawn without a valid reason.
● Withdrawal After Acceptance: If an author wishes to withdraw a manuscript after it has been formally accepted, a written request must be submitted to the editorial office. Withdrawal requests must include:
○ Consent from all co-authors.
○ A valid and justified reason for withdrawal.
● Ethical Considerations: Manuscripts may not be withdrawn for reasons such as submission to another journal, lack of interest, or trivial revisions. If ethical violations such as plagiarism or data fabrication are discovered post-acceptance, JDR reserves the right to take corrective action, including notifying relevant institutions or funding bodies.
JDR supports the integrity of the academic publishing process and expects authors to follow responsible submission and withdrawal practices to maintain scholarly credibility.
JDR requires that all supporting data, materials, and methods relevant to a submitted manuscript be made accessible to the Editorial Board and referees during the review process. This ensures transparency, reproducibility, and thorough evaluation of the research.
Reviewers may be asked to assess the adequacy of access to datasets, materials, and methodologies, and their availability may influence the editorial decision. Authors must provide clear details regarding how external researchers can access any referenced data or materials.
JDR reserves the right to decline publication if authors fail to provide sufficient assurances that they can meet the journal’s data-sharing policies. Ensuring openness in research materials enhances credibility, promotes academic collaboration, and maintains the integrity of scholarly discourse.
The authors of each article published in the Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) bear full responsibility for the content of their work. Neither JDR, its editors, the publisher, nor any individuals involved in the creation, production, or distribution of the journal assume any liability for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented in published articles.
JDR does not guarantee the validity of research findings, interpretations, or conclusions and shall not be held responsible for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages that may result from the use of published material. Readers are advised to independently verify the content and exercise their own judgment when relying on published research.
By publishing with JDR, authors acknowledge their accountability for the integrity of their work and confirm that it meets ethical and academic standards.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) follows strict ethical guidelines to prevent plagiarism and safeguard academic integrity. Plagiarism constitutes the unacknowledged reproduction of ideas, text, or intellectual property, including misattribution of authorship. According to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), plagiarism includes "theft or misappropriation of intellectual property and the substantial unattributed textual copying of another's work." JDR maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards any form of plagiarism.
Definition and Scope of Plagiarism
Plagiarism is considered to have occurred when substantial portions of text are copied and pasted without appropriate attribution. Authors must ensure proper citation and acknowledgment when reusing their own previously published work or that of others. Failing to do so creates a misleading impression of originality and will not be accepted.
Plagiarism includes but is not limited to:
● Direct copying of text, data, images, or ideas from another source without proper attribution.
● Paraphrasing without acknowledging the original source.
● Self-plagiarism (reusing one’s previously published work without citation or permission).
● Uncredited translations of previously published material.
Plagiarism Detection and Screening
JDR employs advanced plagiarism detection tools such as Turnitin, iThenticate, and Plagiarism X Checker to screen all submitted manuscripts. These tools compare submissions against a vast database of published research, online sources, and proprietary content to detect any overlap or duplication beyond acceptable limits.
Every manuscript submitted to JDR undergoes a mandatory plagiarism check before proceeding to the peer-review stage. If plagiarism is identified at any stage of the editorial process, appropriate action will be taken based on the severity of the case.
Consequences of Plagiarism
JDR takes instances of plagiarism seriously. Actions taken may include:
● Pre-publication detection: If plagiarism is identified during the review process, the manuscript will be rejected immediately. The editorial team may also notify the authors' affiliated institutions and funding agencies if the violation is severe.
● Post-publication detection: If plagiarism is discovered after an article has been published, JDR reserves the right to retract the manuscript and issue a public notice on its website. The retraction will be documented in the journal’s archive and reported to indexing databases.
● Ethical Reporting: In cases of serious ethical violations, JDR may inform the author’s institution, funding bodies, or the original authors whose work has been plagiarized.
Guidelines for Authors to Avoid Plagiarism
To maintain academic integrity, JDR advises authors to:
● Properly attribute all borrowed ideas, text, data, or images.
● Use quotation marks when incorporating verbatim text and cite the source.
● Paraphrase appropriately while ensuring proper citation.
● Disclose any overlapping work and cite prior publications, even when reusing one's own work.
By submitting a manuscript to JDR, authors confirm their adherence to these ethical standards. The journal remains committed to preserving the credibility of published research and maintaining strict ethical publishing practices.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) is committed to maintaining the integrity, transparency, and objectivity of the scholarly publishing process. To ensure readers can assess any potential biases, all authors, reviewers, and editorial board members must disclose any competing financial or non-financial interests related to their work.
Competing interests refer to any financial or non-financial affiliations, relationships, or commitments that could influence—or be perceived to influence—the research process, analysis, or interpretation of findings. Full disclosure allows for an informed and unbiased assessment of published work.
a. Financial Competing Interests
Financial competing interests arise when an author, reviewer, or editor has a financial stake in the research being published. These interests include:
● Research Funding: Direct or indirect financial support from institutions, organizations, or sponsors that may benefit from the publication.
● Employment and Compensation: Any past, present, or anticipated employment with an entity that has financial interests in the research outcomes.
● Personal Financial Gains: Stock ownership, equity, royalties, consultation fees, honoraria, or any financial remuneration related to the research topic.
● Patents and Intellectual Property: Existing or pending patents that may be affected by the findings of the published work.
b. Non-Financial Competing Interests
Non-financial competing interests refer to personal, professional, or ideological affiliations that may impact the research or its review process. These include:
● Unpaid Advisory Roles: Voluntary involvement in government agencies, non-governmental organizations, or advocacy groups relevant to the research topic.
● Institutional Affiliations: Associations with universities, research institutions, or professional societies that may influence the research process.
● Collaborative Relationships: Past or ongoing research collaborations that may introduce a perceived bias in reviewing or publishing decisions.
● Editorial and Reviewer Roles: Prior involvement with the journal or any editorial influence that could compromise impartiality.
By disclosing any competing interests, JDR ensures transparency and safeguards the objectivity of academic publishing. All stakeholders are expected to declare any relevant conflicts before engaging in the submission, review, or editorial decision-making process.
The Journal of Discourse Review (JDR) maintains the integrity of scholarly publishing by ensuring that all published articles adhere to ethical and editorial standards. While the editorial decision is final, certain circumstances may necessitate the retraction, removal, or correction of a published article to maintain academic transparency and credibility.
Grounds for Retraction
An article may be retracted if:
● Plagiarism: The article is found to contain uncredited or substantial duplication of previously published work.
● Bogus Authorship: The authorship is misrepresented or includes individuals who did not contribute significantly to the research.
● Fraudulent Data: The publication is based on falsified, fabricated, or manipulated data that mislead the academic community.
● Correction in Publication: Significant errors affecting the validity of the findings or conclusions are identified post-publication.
Retraction Process and Accessibility
● Retracted articles will remain available in the journal’s archives with a “Retracted” watermark across the PDF to indicate their status.
● In cases involving legal, ethical, or factual inaccuracies, the article may be permanently removed, and an official retraction statement will be published on the journal’s website.
● Any necessary corrections or clarifications will be issued following COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines to ensure academic integrity.
For any queries regarding article retraction, please contact:
Contact
Dr. Inzamul Sarkar
Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Discourse Review (JDR)
Room No 106, Mahesh Paradise Apartment
Bahadurpally Village, Hyderabad-500043
Email: [email protected]